A Mother's Opinion on the Mercury Vaccine Autism Link

Posted on Jul 22, 2008 in Autism, Chronic Disease

My son was injected with 12.5 micrograms of mercury the day after he was born. According to our government, the maximum safe limit for his weight would have been 0.4 micrograms (that’s point four, a fraction of a microgram).

A Mother’s Opinion from the NewsObserver.

Regarding the July 9 article “Parents push fringe remedy for autism“:

I find it incredibly hypocritical for anyone to suggest that treating a child with documented (yes, parents test for metals first) heavy-metal toxicity with a drug approved by the FDA for treatment in lead poisoning is “unethical” and lacks “reason” when our own government approved and mandated newborns be injected with more mercury than the government itself claims is safe.

My son was injected with 12.5 micrograms of mercury the day after he was born. According to our government, the maximum safe limit for his weight would have been 0.4 micrograms (that’s point four, a fraction of a microgram). That was only the beginning of infusion of mercury for him. So when we found out, we tested and then chelated our son and saw major improvements in him as a result.

Parents are not treating autism; we are treating vaccine injury. And the fact that it is working in hundreds and hundreds of kids is a truth that the CDC simply cannot face.

If parents are using “fringe” treatments, it is only because the medical establishment is conveniently turning a blind eye toward what our children are truly suffering from. Why? Because they are responsible!

Allison Byrd

Garner